|
|
|
|
Minutes of Consultation Between Canadian Union of Postal Workers And Canada Post Corporation
This meeting was held on August 11, 2006 at West Beaver Creek facility, to review the MVI – 120 POC data capture process, for the Restructure exercise in progress on site.
Present were:
Mike Duquette Kevin Burtt Learey Charles Randy Saunders Steve Chapman Ashok Kapoor Laura Jewel Soren Madsen (On phone)
Union: Referred to a communication from Michael Tong to CUPW Regional Directors on July 2005. The process for MVI – 120 POC should have been consulted in May 2006 to discuss: Ø what resources should be used Ø which EE’s will participate Ø agree on the process and selection of 120 POC
It was mentioned that the Union observer and EE’s involved did a dry run for 1-week. There should be 7- EE’s counting but we are managing. Employees currently involved are D. Osgood; S. Ebel; Laura Jewel; J. Youstnowski, S. Chapman. LCA’s Lauren and Bill fill in case of absences.
M: Supervisor Chris Picken is assisting with data input. In case of need we can bring back Relief Supv’ John.
U: - any problems with vacant POC? We can have up to 30% vacancy rate without any affect on the count as long as it is in the same LDU. - Do we count Hold mail POC? Yes, redirect is counted as long as it is not a permanent move. - Do we identify POC on the case, in case the EE is off duty. Yes, they are red flagged, but some of the red dots are falling off. - How do we identify, it is an A/O? By square inches and < than 3-lb weight. - Any other concerns?
M: If there is a problem, we are not hearing of any.
U: How were the 120 POC picked? Steve Chapman explained the process. There should be proportionate % of representation of residential and commercial calls in 120 POC. U: There is not one High Rise building in the 120 POC within L4B. These are considered as part of residential POC. U: What % of Business calls? In Thornhill, there are 1,717 Business & 21,520 Residential POC. Only 7-Business calls are in 120 POC. L4B has 1,851 Business & 7,232 Residential POC. Only 10-Business calls are in 120. M: 120-POC relate to trend of mails not volume count. U: Steve Chapman agreed that as far practicable, 120-POC would represent proportional % of the demographics of the Station/Depot/area. L4B Business POC are not proportionate to %, should be > 20%. M: Soren advised that the POC system spits out the 120-POC. Representation by %age is the intent of the system. He will check with Jamie Steane and advise. Let us meet again, once clarification is received. U: We can drop off some POC to bring relative %ages in line.
Parties agreed to meet August 16, 2006 @ 10 AM.
U: is comfortable with how 120-POC MVI count is proceeding, but if we had met prior, this could have been avoided. M: we will disseminate to Delivery services, Zone Managers & Directors that such consultations take place.
Meeting adjourned.
|
|
|
